Business Tenants have been granted relief from forfeiture during the Coronavirus moratorium period.
The government has announced that landlords cannot bring forfeiture proceedings for non-payment of rent between the 25th March 2020 and the 30 June 2020, by virtue of Section 82 of the Coronavirus Act 2020.
The Act contains provision for the ‘relevant period’ to be extended more than once by way of statutory instrument, so the total protected relevant period is, as yet, unknown.
What is ‘rent’?
‘Rent’ includes any sum a tenant is liable to pay under a relevant business tenancy, such as service charges or insurance contributions.
In other words, non-payment of any sums under the lease during the relevant period, are to be disregarded for the purposes of bringing forfeiture proceedings. Where new or existing proceedings are already being brought, any period of non-payment of rent must disregard the ‘relevant period’.
Only relevant business tenancies are granted this relief. A “relevant business tenancy” means one falling under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (the ‘Act’).
Section 23(1) of the Act states that Business Tenancies are “a tenancy where the property comprised in the tenancy is or includes premises which are occupied by the tenant and are so occupied for the purposes of a business carried on by him or for those and other purposes.”
You must be aware that it doesn’t matter if the tenant is a person, or an incorporated company.
A business tenancy can arise where the lease prevents use of the premises for a business, if the tenant has used it in breach of this and the immediate Landlord has acquiesced to such breach. However, the Act does not apply to residential tenancies where a Home Business is run.
Business Tenancies include tenancies arising without any formal written lease where the tenant has been in occupation for over 12 months. The following are not business tenancies which would attract security of tenure under Part II of the Act:
- Tenancies at Will
- Written leases for business use of under 6 months (with no right to extend the term at the end)
- Agricultural tenancies
- Farm business tenancies
- Leases granted ‘Code Rights’ ie. relating to land used for telecommunications apparatus under the Communications Act 2003
Do I have to allow the tenant not to pay rent during the moratorium period?
No. You can continue to demand rent as normal, although there are provisions in the Coronavirus Act that state that if you don’t demand rent during that period, you will not be deemed to waiver your right to collect it.
You are still entitled to payment of your rent and can withdraw sums from any rent deposit deed and demand topping up of the deposit, although you will not be able to bring forfeiture proceedings if the tenant cannot top it up during that period, since this could fall within the definition of ‘rent’.
You can also employ any other existing rights in your lease, such as demanding rent from a guarantor. Nothing but an express written waiver of your right to receive rent will give the tenant the right to stop paying rent during the moratorium period.
Should I negotiate with a tenant during the moratorium period?
You should bear in mind that ‘non-essential’ services have been ordered to close by the Government reducing a business tenant’s income. Even where your lease requires certain opening hours for business, these cannot be met and it is unlikely that you will be able to enforce those provisions against the tenant.
The tenant may not be able to survive the ‘lockdown’ of its business meaning a loss of future income for you if you insist on full payment during this period. You should therefore consider the long term repercussions of insisting on payment of rent and consider whether it is possible for you to agree to a lesser sum in the short term.
However, there is no requirement for you to act in good faith. You may want to check the terms of any insurance policy providing cover for unpaid rent and which is likely to be breached if you agree to rent concessions. If you do agree to allow concessions, these ought to be documented either as a deed of variation to the lease or a side letter.
Concessions for landlords
There are no concessions for landlords. You must continue to provide any services required by your lease, unless it is varied in the way mentioned above. Social distancing rules and the lock down must be observed in accordance with government guidance.
The Landlord obligations should therefore be considered carefully, especially if your tenant requests concessions –which may be an opportunity to agree on sensible variations to your obligations also.
If you’d like to discuss any of the items mentioned in this article then please don’t hesitate to contact our commercial property team on 02392 981000 or email email@example.com
- Acting for land owners or property developers in relation to both residential and commercial development projects
- Advising on the structure and content of the legal documentation associated with the sale and acquisition of development sites
- Negotiating section 106 planning agreements
- Negotiation of option agreements and conditional planning agreements
- Plot sales / disposals
Landlord and Tenant
- Advising landlords and tenants in relation to the taking of and the grant of commercial leases of all form of commercial property
- Dealing with subleases of commercial premises
- Dealing with ancillary leasehold documentation such as licences to alter, change of use or licence to sublet
- Advising in relation to variations of leases
- Advising in relation to agreements for leases including development obligations
Real Estate Finance
- Acting for lenders or borrowers in relation to the taking and granting of security over all forms of commercial property
- Acting and advising borrowers in relation to obligations in standard security documentation issued by both corporate and individual lenders
- Perfecting a lenders security over the property at the Land Registry and Companies House
- Dealing with commercial remortgages
- Dealing with variations to existing security or substituted security
- Acting for liquidators, administrators in bankruptcy in the sale of all forms of commercial property
- Acting on and dealing with the sale of property under the Proceeds of Crime Act
- Acting for buyers of commercial property from liquidators, administrators and trustees in bankruptcy
- Acting for sellers or buyers of all forms of commercial investment property
- Advising on the due diligence to be undertaken in connection with the acquisition of investment premises
- Advising in relation to the VAT and TUPE implications arising out of an investment transaction
- Advising buyers in relation to their ongoing liabilities under the individual leases
- Advising on the property aspects arising out of the sale and purchase of businesses
- Advising on the nature and extent of property warranties included within the legal documentation
- Advising and dealing with obtaining the necessary consents for the transfer of any leasehold premises as part of the corporate transaction
Property related Pension Schemes
- Acting for pension providers and individuals in relation to property related pension scheme arrangements
- Advising pension companies in relation to the legal structure of property related schemes
- Carrying out appropriate due diligence in relation to the property aspects of a pension scheme
- Advising on and dealing with issues arising out of the transfer of assets from one pension fund to another
Sales and Acquisition of Commercial Property
- Acting for sellers or buyers in relation to the sale and acquisition of all forms of commercial property
Making a claim for negligent advice
The client asked us to consider and advise on the conduct of their former solicitors during both of the cases. We careful analysed many files and documents, including the former solicitors’ files, and concluded that the client had a claim.
We pursued the solicitors for negligent advice and handling of the cases, with a view to recovering our client’s losses. This involved extensive dealings with the firm, through their professional indemnity insurers and city lawyers.
They refused to pay the claim, despite being provided with considerable supporting evidence and legal argument during various attempts to negotiate and settle the dispute.
Pursuing the professional negligence case in the High Court
We started High Court proceedings, which the former solicitors defended by denying the allegations and raising a number of technical legal points.
Ultimately we exerted sufficient pressure in the litigation to force a settlement before the case reached trial, resulting in our client recovering a six-figure sum. This represented the vast majority of all legal costs they had paid, as well as Verisona Law’s legal fees.
Individual Property Owner
“Verisona Law dealt with a complicated dispute with a former manufacturing supplier forced into administrative receivership. Their clear, calm advice never wavered: their tenacity and diligence provided our company with a successful result”.
MD of Textile Wholesaler
"Having recently used Verisona Law to help recover a commercial debt due to us, I would highly recommend them. Jeremy was very professional and helpful, giving information throughout the case, and he was also very calm which really helped us."
"I would like to thank you for the first class service we have received from you. Your advice and the professional way you treated us throughout culminated in a result which, prior to your appointment, seemed a long way away."